Cardinals Coach Ken Whisenhunt initially supported Matt Leinart as the starter, but after a few weeks of training camp, has abandoned him. Without Kurt Warner by his side, Leinart isn't the only Cardinals leader who needs to prove himself.
Aug 31, 2010 - The quarterback situation with the Arizona Cardinals is a mess. You have a guy in Matt Leinart -- who had every expectation that he was going to be the starter -- getting yanked around by his coach and lashing out in a public and disruptive way.
This is a mess that Ken Whisenhunt created when he named Derek Anderson the starting quarterback for the third preseason game with little or no warning.
It would be nice if Leinart had kept some of his thoughts to himself and not answered questions quite so candidly, but at the same time, it is on the coach to head this off at the pass.
Leinart went into camp as the Cardinals starting quarterback. He started the first two games as the starting quarterback and suddenly he's not the guy anymore and he had every right to an explanation from his coach as to why the move was made.
It is not up to Leinart to seek out Whisenhunt and get his questions answered. It's up to Whisenhunt to give Leinart a legitimate explanation and lay out where and how Anderson beat Leinart for the job despite numbers in the first two (now three) preseason games that say otherwise.
Whisenhunt supporters have argued that Leinart didn't lose the job by going 19-for-23 in three games. They say that Leinart had four years to prove himself and yet that's not what Whisenhunt said when Anderson was signed to the team in March.
"Certainly Matt has earned the right to be the guy and that's the way we're going forward as we proceed," Whisenhunt told reporters after signing Anderson as the backup quarterback this spring.
Anderson was clear about his role, as well, "My understanding was I'm coming there to be the No. 2 and compete and do what I've done over my career."
That's not to say that Whisenhunt hasn't always left the door open for a little healthy competition. In fact, Whisenhunt was very complimentary about how Leinart handled that uncertainly when he spoke with XTRA 910 radio on July 15, a few weeks before training camp started.
He made it clear, again, that he would still look at Derek Anderson and see what he can do, but then went on to praise Matt's improved leadership.
"I think that Matt is mentally much stronger than he was. I think he's very focused on knowing that he can take this team and lead this team and win games and that's a difference that I've seen from him this spring and to me, that's very encouraging," Whisenhunt said.
Whiz cited specifically how Matt responded to questions about whether he would be the starter. Whisenhunt quoted Leinart as saying he wasn't worried about that and that he would show "these guys" that he could lead the team and that he could play.
Here's how Whisenhunt talked about Leinart's attitude:
"When he said that, to me that struck a chord because I said 'He's finally got it. He finally understands it's not about what anybody says; it's about what you do, it's about how you prepare, it's about how you carry yourself on the field, and it's about how you perform. And if you do those things the way I've seen you do it in practice at times and the way I've seen you grow into that the last couple of years you'll be just fine'."
Somewhere between July 15 and Aug. 26, that all fell apart.
Given that, it seems we aren't talking about what Leinart did in Arizona in the years leading up to this camp and we're not talking about his arm strength or other physical aspects of playing quarterback. We are talking about Matt's leadership and confidence and there's no doubt that the two go hand-in-hand.
Football isn't basketball, but we've seen in Phoenix with the Suns' Alvin Gentry how much a coach can do to give his guys that boost. Instead of propping Matt up and giving him that confidence, Whisenhunt's thrown Leinart to the wolves and now suddenly everyone who previously was fine with "Hollywood Matt" is jumping off the bandwagon.
We all knew that Leinart was no Kurt Warner. The plan all along was to run the ball more and change the way the team played and yet people are critical of Matt, who doesn't have the strongest of arms anyway, for not throwing the ball down the field.
How does that make sense?
In limited snaps, Leinart did play it safe, but he never had time to get into any kind of rhythm on those first two games and needless to say, the entire offense wasn't exactly clicking at that point. He acted like a guy who was secure in his job and was trying to work on things in the preseason.
Kurt Warner himself certainly seems to understand this:
I don't know exactly the feeling within the locker room. The feeling around the community is simply that they were looking for someone to step in and do exactly what I did or our team did the last three years. It wasn't going to happen. Matt is a guy who hasn't played in a while, a young guy, still growing into the position. There was no way you can expect him to come out and do the things that I have done, especially right away.
He has been very efficient in training camp. He hasn't made a lot of mistakes. The one thing that I think people are looking at is, he has not made a lot of big plays, the impressive plays, the things that make you say, 'Wow.' I think that is the unfortunate part about it, if they have made that decision, that he didn't get the opportunity to get out there in a game, manage a game and do what he can to help them win.
Leinart's teammates probably weren't comfortable with him yet, but that wasn't ever going to happen until the team had success in games that matter. By replacing him so publicly as the starter, Whisenhunt only made the problem worse.
Leinart is certainly not going to win over the locker room now without the backing of his coach and that ship has sailed.
Maybe Whisenhunt is right that Leinart just doesn't have the stones to be an NFL starting quarterback despite what he said in July. We probably won't really know until Leinart gets a chance to play somewhere else and, at this point, that's the best outcome.
If you don't trust him to start the season at this point then the Cardinals might as well cut Leinart and turn their attention to developing John Skelton and Max Hall.
Leinart will get picked up somewhere and hopefully we will find out if he can play the position. It certainly doesn't seem like he's going to even have the opportunity to fail here in Arizona.
Audio: Whisenhunt talking about Leinart on XTRA 910 radio July 15
Comments
It's up to Matt to approach his coach
Matt can’t control what Whisenhunt does; he can only control how he reacts to what Whisenhunt does. If he wants to find out exactly what he needs to improve and why he was benched, then he needs to go ask his coach that. Sounds like he did yesterday, but unfortunately it was AFTER he aired dirty laundry in the media.
Part of being a leader is NOT making comments that undermine the team or its coach via public channels. By not watching his mouth in “public,” he has shown a lot of people that he has a long way to go, as far as maturity.
As far as I can tell, Whisenhunt has done nothing to depart from his usual MO. It just happens to involve a high-profile quarterback this time.
Bloggin' 'bout AZ sports ... SB Nation Arizona
by Justin Burning on Aug 31, 2010 10:39 AM MST reply actions
#CoSign
On top of it, should Whisenhunt fake confidence in Leinart if he doesn’t have it to begin with? His job isn’t to be Matt’s shrink. His job is to make the tough decisions that make the team a winner. He’s done that since coming to AZ and he shouldn’t change it for Matt.
I once tried to quit a job using a dry erase board. Unfortunately I wrote the first part in Sharpie so I couldn't finish.
by Greg Esposito on Aug 31, 2010 10:57 AM MST up reply actions
Being a shrink
is part of the job…why not pump up Matt, give him full confidence and then see how he does when the games matter?
Or do we really think that Derek Anderson is the better option come Sept 12?
Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Aug 31, 2010 11:07 AM MST up reply actions
His job is to get the best performance from his best players.
Would showing unqualified confidence really been that hard? He had hardly any time on field in any of the first two games, practice reports were almost always how much more accuate Leinert is than Anderson, and I’ve never gotten the feeling that he wasn’t constantly looking over his shoulder.
I’ll admit I know nothing other than the reports we read and that doesn’t include anything about Leinert getting along with his teammates. Maybe he isn’t a leader and doesn’t inspire his teammates and maybe Anderson does. But maybe he hasn’t been given the opportunity.
Oh well. I liked Hall since before the draft and have been pretty impressed with Skelton… At least there’s some potential for the future. I just think there was more potential with Leinert than we’ll ever really know.
by psknapp on Aug 31, 2010 11:37 AM MST up reply actions
I disagree. Whisenhunt should have had the conversation before Saturday’s game. If there was something expected of him in the first two games, then he should have talked to him about that. Matt played iy safe, yes. But considering how poorly the line played in those first two games, how poorly the running game was going and the near-universal expectation that the Cardinals are going to be more run focused, can you blame him? From what I saw, it took Anderson 3-4 series to get into his groove as well and Leinert never even had that opportunity. This is preseason. This is where you start feeling your way out on the field and he had barely any time to do that.
And I still believe we are getting very little context on Matt’s statements. He’s obviously frustrated and he certainly could have worded (or at least timed) his answers better, but he’s said the right things for years and one slip and eveybody’s ready to brand him as an immature malcontent.
by psknapp on Aug 31, 2010 11:22 AM MST up reply actions
I'm not saying Whisenhunt should or should not have approached Leinart
Saying Leinart can’t control what Whisenhunt does, so he has to react accordingly. Which would have been to go to Whiz’s office and ask before airing laundry in the media.
Bloggin' 'bout AZ sports ... SB Nation Arizona
by Justin Burning on Aug 31, 2010 11:41 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team, throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.
by JoeCB1991 on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM MST up reply actions
Matt Leinart will start on Sept. 12
I think Whiz knows this, and even DA knows. Whiz isn’t going to shower someone with praise, especially for performances during meaningless preseason games, and Matt should know that. Whiz’s MO is to keep players UNCOMFORTABLE in their roles, because there is always someone putting in the work to take their job. That’s a winning formula, and that’s why I’m agreeing with whatever Whiz does and says.
by ajotanelsona on Aug 31, 2010 11:42 AM MST reply actions
I don't agree....but I really hope you're right.
RIP Seasons of Discontent
by Scott Howard on Aug 31, 2010 3:47 PM MST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed